Google is probably an internet company, with dozens of products and services that rotate around the technology that has made us connect for decades. For most people, the gateway to the internet, in fact, another Google product, with Chrome took the Lion section of the browser market. It can be debated that Google Chrome is the most widely used software in the world, given how it is used on almost every computational device that can be imagined. It doesn’t immediately mean that it is the best way to experience the web, and there is also a serious reason why you want to avoid using Chrome if you can afford it.

Performance and stability

Just because it’s most often used doesn’t mean it’s the best. There are various factors that contribute to the success of Chrome on the market. And while credit must be given to several features that help sell browsers to users, it is far from being the most impressive when it comes to performance and stability. In fact, some Chrome users might even admit that they are forced to use a browser for this feature or it, even though it has a lot of heartache and headaches over browser performance.

The internet is filled with anecdotes about an unsatisfied chrome hunger for RAM and battery power. When people become more dependent on laptops with relatively limited hardware resources and on the web to work, study, or entertainment, a greedy web browser is probably the last thing they need. Actually, the last thing they need is for chrome falls because it runs out of memory or, worse, some bugs from the extension.

To be fair, Google has worked to improve Chrome’s performance and reduce its tracks, especially by limiting how much JavaScript work behind the background. At the same time, this can sometimes lead to suboptimal user experience, which Google also tries to avoid. It still implies that Chrome is a big animal by default, which must be tamed and wear food.

Security extension

Once upon a time, the web browser competes in the number of third party add-ons, sometimes known as extensions, which they support. The extension system allows browsers to stay slim, at least compared to the Behemoth which is Internet Explorer, while leaving the door open to functions that are not imagined by browser developers or even intend. That, of course, it is necessary that the software has hooks that can be connected with extensions to implement these features, which are sometimes included to modify users what are seen on web pages or even touching files on the user’s computer.

Unfortunately, extensions have also become a source of problems in the long term, endangering browser stability and user security. The problem that makes it difficult is how Google runs its Chrome web store, which is even more open than the Google Play Store for Android. In return for a more open ecosystem, almost no quality control, and many malware-Laden extensions can slip through cracks, often disguised themselves as extensions originating from leading developers.

Google has tried to plug in the big hole, but the strategy has become a two-edged sword. It has limited what extensions can get access to reduce the negative side effects of dangerous extensions but also removed the functionality needed by several extensions. Unfortunately, it’s not an agreement made, and there are still some troubled add-ons that pass through Google’s supervision.

Calling Arrangement

Add-ons and extensions should make the browser simpler and lighter, but things don’t always change like that in the end. In addition to being a hungry software resource, Chrome is also a complex, and the hassle of bloody into the configuration option. Almost like Google products, Chrome has a page on the settings page that the browser itself requires a mini search engine to find appropriate controls.

harry

See author's posts